首页> 外文OA文献 >Dryden as a critic and adapter of Shakespeare in the context of seventeenth-century dramatic criticism.
【2h】

Dryden as a critic and adapter of Shakespeare in the context of seventeenth-century dramatic criticism.

机译:德莱顿(Dryden)在十七世纪戏剧性批评的背景下作为莎士比亚的批评家和适配器。

摘要

To evaluate Dryden's criticism of Shakespeare in the context of seventeenth-century dramatic criticism I have examined some of the important tendencies of the Restoration drama. Dryden's criticism shows many influences. In his appreciation of Shakespeare Dryden responds to the theories of Le Bossu among the French and Longinus among the classical critics. The influence of important classical critics - Aristotle, Horace and Longinus -- has been worked out in detail; for the influence of the continental critics I have largely relied on the researches of other Dryden-scholars. A resume of the seventeenth century criticism of Shakespeare is made to place Dryden's Shakespearean-criticism in the context of his contemporaries. Rymer's Othello is examined in detail because his Shakespearean-criticism is antithetical to Dryden's. The difference between the two critics is discussed; special attention is paid to Rymer's' poetic justice because despite Dryden's disagreements with Rymer on his derogatory criticism of the Elizabethan dramatists Dryden subscribed to the principle of didactic function of the drama. His adaptations of Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra and Troilus and Cressida are governed by the principles of morality and decorum. As has emerged in this study, Dryden's criticism of Shakespeare is governed partly by the influence of the contemporary and classical critics on him; partly by his own career as a playwright and adapter of Shakespeare; and the largest single factor contributing to his appreciation of Shakespeare has been his intuitive recognition of a genius. In his admiration for Shakespeare Dryden sometimes resists the pressure of his age; equally, sometimes he gives way to it. This thesis attempts to study the extent of this pressure on Dryden; when, how and why it influenced his criticism of Shakespeare; and equally to examine the factors contributing to his resistance to it. Dryden, the neoclassical critic of Shakespeare ends up in Dryden the adapter of Shakespeare; and in the process of adaptations occurs a collapse of the former; thus, leading to an inevitable departure from criticism by rule to a total surrender to the force of Shakespeare's dramatic genius.
机译:为了在十七世纪戏剧批评的背景下评估德莱顿对莎士比亚的批评,我研究了《恢复》戏剧的一些重要趋势。德莱顿的批评显示出许多影响。在对莎士比亚的欣赏中,德莱顿对法国评论家勒博苏的理论和古典评论家对浪琴的理论做出了回应。重要的古典评论家-亚里斯多德,霍勒斯和浪琴斯的影响力已经得到了详细的研究。由于大陆评论家的影响,我很大程度上依赖于其他德莱顿学者的研究。制作了十七世纪莎士比亚批评的简历,以将德莱顿的莎士比亚批评置于他同时代的背景下。赖默(Rymer)的《奥赛罗(Othello)》受到了详细研究,因为他对莎士比亚的批评与德莱顿(Dryden)的批评是对立的。讨论了两个批评家之间的区别。特别要注意莱默的诗意正义,因为尽管德莱顿(Dryden)对莱默(Rymer)对伊丽莎白时代的戏剧家的贬损批评与莱默(Rymer)意见分歧,但莱德登(Dryden)仍然赞成该戏剧的教学功能原则。他对莎士比亚的《安东尼和克娄巴特拉》和《特鲁伊鲁斯和克雷西达》的改编受道德和礼节原则的支配。正如这项研究所显示的那样,德莱顿对莎士比亚的批评部分受制于当代和古典批评家对他的影响。部分是因为他自己是莎士比亚的剧作家和适配器的职业生涯;他对莎士比亚的欣赏最大的一个因素就是他对天才的直觉认识。在对莎士比亚的敬佩中,德莱顿(Dryden)有时会抗拒他那时代的压力。同样,有时他让位。本文试图研究这种压力对德莱顿的影响程度。它何时,如何以及为什么影响了他对莎士比亚的批评;并平等地研究造成他抵抗的因素。莎士比亚的新古典主义评论家德莱顿最终落入莎士比亚的偶像德莱顿。在适应过程中,前者崩溃了;因此,不可避免地要摆脱法治批评,而完全屈服于莎士比亚戏剧天才的力量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Plomley, Swaran.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1977
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号